Original research
Reducing Sitting Time After Stroke: A Phase II Safety and Feasibility Randomized Controlled Trial

Presented in part as a poster to the European Stroke Organization, April 17–19, 2015, Glasgow, United Kingdom; and Stroke 2015 (a combined conference of the Stroke Society of Australasia and Smartstrokes NSW), September 1–5, 2015, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.10.094Get rights and content

Abstract

Objective

To test the safety, feasibility, and effectiveness of reducing sitting time in stroke survivors.

Design

Randomized controlled trial with attention-matched controls and blinded assessments.

Setting

Community.

Participants

Stroke survivors (N=35; 22 men; mean age, 66.9±12.7y).

Interventions

Four counseling sessions over 7 weeks with a message of sit less and move more (intervention group) or calcium for bone health (attention-matched control group).

Main Outcome Measures

Measures included safety (adverse events, increases in pain, spasticity, or fatigue) and feasibility (adherence to trial protocol). Secondary measures included time spent sitting (including in prolonged bouts ≥30min), standing, and stepping as measured by the thigh-worn inclinometer (7d, 24h/d protocol) and time spent in physical activity of at least moderate intensity as measured by a triaxial accelerometer. The Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adults was used to describe changes in use of time.

Results

Thirty-three participants completed the full protocol. Four participants reported falls during the intervention period with no other adverse events. From a baseline average of 640.7±99.6min/d, daily sitting time reduced on average by 30±50.6min/d (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.8–54.6) in the intervention group and 40.4±92.5min/d in the control group (95% CI, 13.0–93.8). Participants in both groups also reduced their time spent in prolonged sitting bouts (≥30min) and increased time spent standing and stepping.

Conclusions

Our protocol was both safe and feasible. Participants in both groups spent less time sitting and more time standing and stepping postintervention, but outcomes were not superior for intervention participants. Attention matching is desirable in clinical trials and may have contributed to the positive outcomes for control participants.

Section snippets

Methods

This was a pilot randomized controlled trial with an attention-matched control group, concealed allocation, and blinded assessment of outcome. The trial was registered with the Australian and New Zealand Trial Registry (ACTRN12612000958886). Participants were unaware of the intervention of interest. They were told only that this was a trial of healthy living after stroke. A 1:1 randomization sequence was prepared by a statistician independent of the project. A research assistant independent of

Results

Participants were recruited between February 2013 and February 2014, with final data collected in May 2014. Figure 1 presents the flow of participants through the trial. Table 1 presents baseline characteristics of the 35 participants. Four (intervention: n=2; control: n=2) participants reported falls during the intervention period. None of the falls were injurious. There were no other adverse events reported. Pain, spasticity, and fatigue did not change between baseline and postintervention

Discussion

Stroke survivors are both sedentary (spending large proportions of their day sitting down), and physically inactive. Previous research has largely focused on encouraging stroke survivors to increase their time in physical activity of at least moderate intensity. This is the first clinical trial to investigate an intervention aimed at encouraging stroke survivors to replace sitting time with light-intensity activity (ie, sit less and move more). Our protocol was both safe and feasible, with no

Conclusions

To our knowledge, this is the first clinical trial to demonstrate that it is possible for people with stroke to sit less each day. We have demonstrated that the clinical trial protocol is both safe and feasible and leads to reductions in daily sitting time. However, the health benefits associated with sitting less each day remain unclear.

Suppliers

  • a.

    PAL Technologies.

  • b.

    Microsoft Access 2010; Microsoft.

  • c.

    Actigraph.

  • d.

    Sensewear arm band; Temple Healthcare.

Acknowledgment

We thanks Samantha McKenzie, BAppSci (Phty), for assistance with data collection.

References (37)

  • V.L. Feigin et al.

    Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010

    Lancet

    (2014)
  • K. Hardie et al.

    Ten-year risk of first recurrent stroke and disability after first-ever stroke in the Perth Community Stroke Study

    Stroke

    (2004)
  • M.J. O'Donnell et al.

    Risk factors for ischaemic and intracerebral haemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries (the INTERSTROKE study): a case-control study

    Lancet

    (2010)
  • P.C. Dempsey et al.

    Managing sedentary behavior to reduce the risk of diabetes and cardiovascular disease

    Curr Diab Rep

    (2014)
  • D.W. Dunstan et al.

    Too much sitting–a health hazard

    Diabetes Res Clin Pract

    (2012)
  • C. English et al.

    Sitting and activity time in people with stroke

    Phys Ther

    (2015 Jun 25)
  • C. English et al.

    Physical activity and sedentary behaviors in people with stroke living in the community: a systematic review

    Phys Ther

    (2014)
  • D. Kunkel et al.

    Physical inactivity post-stroke: a 3-year longitudinal study

    Disabil Rehabil

    (2015)
  • S.A. Moore et al.

    Physical activity, sedentary behaviour and metabolic control following stroke: a cross-sectional and longitudinal study

    PLoS One

    (2013)
  • L. Paul et al.

    Physical activity profiles and sedentary behaviour in people following stroke: a cross-sectional study

    Disabil Rehabil

    (2015)
  • Z. Tieges et al.

    Sedentary behavior in the first year after stroke: a longitudinal cohort study with objective measures

    Arch Phys Med Rehabil

    (2015)
  • D.W. Dunstan et al.

    Breaking up prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glucose and insulin responses

    Diabetes Care

    (2012)
  • C.E. Matthews et al.

    Mortality benefits for replacing sitting time with different physical activities

    Med Sci Sports Exerc

    (2015)
  • G.N. Healy et al.

    Reducing sitting time in office workers: short-term efficacy of a multicomponent intervention

    Prev Med

    (2013)
  • A. Martin et al.

    Interventions with potential to reduce sedentary time in adults: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Br J Sports Med

    (2015)
  • S. Rubak et al.

    Motivational interviewing: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Br J Gen Pract

    (2005)
  • S.L. Nicholson et al.

    A qualitative theory guided analysis of stroke survivors' perceived barriers and facilitators to physical activity

    Disabil Rehabil

    (2014)
  • P.X. Xinying et al.

    Can a food frequency questionnaire be used to capture dietary intake data in a 4 week clinical intervention trial?

    Asia Pac J Clin Nutr

    (2004)
  • Cited by (53)

    • The SitLess With MS Program: Intervention Feasibility and Change in Sedentary Behavior

      2020, Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Current affiliation for English, School of Health Sciences, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.

    Supported by the National Stroke Foundation Nancy and Vic Meyers Prevention Grant; a National Health and Medical Research Council Training Fellowship (no. 610312); a National Health and Medical Research Council Career Development Fellowship (no. 108029); a Heart Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship (no. PH 12B 7054); a National Health and Medical Research Council Established Research Fellowship (no. 1058635); infrastructure support from the Victorian State Government; and the Australian Government's Collaborative Research Networks program.

    Australian and New Zealand Trial Registry No.: ACTRN12612000958886.

    Disclosures: none.

    View full text