Elsevier

Manual Therapy

Volume 19, Issue 1, February 2014, Pages 59-64
Manual Therapy

Original article
Normative sciatic nerve excursion during a modified straight leg raise test

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2013.07.012Get rights and content

Abstract

Minimal data exists on how much sciatic nerve motion occurs during straight leg raise (SLR). The purpose of this study was to report preliminary normative ranges of sciatic nerve excursion using real time ultrasound during a modified SLR.

The sciatic nerve was scanned in the posterior thigh in sixteen asymptomatic participants (age range 19–68 years). Nerve excursion was measured in transverse and longitudinal planes during knee extension from 90° to 0°, with the hip flexed to 30° and 60°. The ultrasound data was analysed off-line using cross correlation software. Results demonstrated that most nerves moved superficially during knee extension, a large proportion (10/16) moved laterally. Longitudinal excursion ranged from 6.4 to 14.7 mm (mean (SD) 9.92 mm (2.2)) in 30° hip flexion, and 5.1–20.2 mm (mean (SD) 12.4 mm (4.4)) in 60° hip flexion. Mean nerve excursion was significantly greater in 60° hip flexion (p = 0.02).

There is a large between-subject variation in sciatic nerve excursion during this modified SLR in asymptomatic subjects. Mean nerve excursion was found to be higher with the hip pre-positioned in greater flexion, suggesting that pre-loading may not consistently reduce excursion.

Introduction

Neurodynamic techniques are used frequently in the assessment and treatment of patients with neural mechanosensitivity (Butler, 2000, Coppieters and Alshami, 2007, Bialosky et al., 2009, Nee et al., 2012). The straight leg raise test (SLR) is a long established measure of mechanosensitivity of the lumbosacral plexus, sciatic nerve and its distal extensions (Butler, 2000, Boyd et al., 2009, Walsh and Hall, 2009). However, there is limited research investigating normal sciatic nerve excursion during the test (Smith, 1956, Breig and Marions, 1963, Goddard and Reid, 1965, Coppieters et al., 2006). During SLR, cadaveric studies have found the sciatic nerve to move between 4 mm (Goddard and Reid, 1965) and 28 mm (Coppieters et al., 2006). Goddard and Reid (1965) investigated sciatic nerve excursion at the sacral ala in 30 cadavers and found the sciatic nerve to move distally between 4 and 7.5 mm. These figures were markedly less than Coppieters et al. (2006), who found 28 mm of proximal nerve excursion during the SLR with the ankle dorsiflexed in 8 male cadavers 2 cm distal to the ischial tuberosity. Greater excursion found by Coppieters et al. (2006) could be explained by two factors. Firstly, measurements were taken closer to the moving joint by Coppieters et al. (2006), where the nerve is more compliant (Dilley et al., 2003, Phillips et al., 2004, Boyd et al., 2005). Secondly, measurements taken by Goddard and Reid (1965) were close to where the sciatic nerve branches from the lumbosacral plexus, which could have resulted in less excursion (Millesi et al., 1995).

The major limitation of these latter two studies is their applicability to living humans. Since living tissue is likely to have marked differences in its response to loading and movement it is not possible to extrapolate such findings directly to living individuals.

A recent in vivo study using B mode ultrasound found less than 2 mm of distal tibial nerve excursion behind the knee with the limb positioned in SLR and active ankle movements performed (Boyd et al., 2012). Sciatic nerve excursion in the posterior thigh during a modified slump test has been found to be in the region of 3 mm (Ellis et al., 2012). Slightly greater excursion was found during a slider manoeuvre (movements in which elongation of the nerve bed at one joint is simultaneously counterbalanced by a reduction in the length of the nerve bed at a distant joint) than a tensioner manoeuvre (manoeuvres in which the combination of joint movements elongate the nerve bed), suggesting that pre-tensioning results in reduced excursion. However, the difference in excursion between the two manoeuvres was around 0.6 mm which is unlikely to be of clinical significance, and only just above the smallest detectable difference (SDD) (0.55 mm) (calculated from standard error of measurement (SEM) 0.2 mm in Ellis et al., 2012).

Whilst Ellis et al. (2012) and Boyd et al. (2012) have initiated some in vivo work on the sciatic and tibial nerves, the very small numbers used by Boyd et al. (2012) and choice of slump test in Ellis et al.'s (2012) study justify further investigation of SLR. Heterogeneity in lower limb range of movement is not uncommon in asymptomatic individuals and has been linked to demographic factors such as age (Nolan et al., 2010). In addition, slightly greater sciatic nerve excursion has been found in younger cadavers compared to older cadavers during SLR (Goddard and Reid, 1965). Another factor which has not been investigated in relation to nerve excursion is height. Whilst range of SLR was not found to be related to height (Boyd and Villa, 2012), this does not rule out a relationship between height and nerve excursion since factors other than nerve excursion could limit the overall range in SLR.

The aim of the present study was to provide preliminary normative data on longitudinal and transverse plane movements of the sciatic nerve measured in the mid-posterior thigh of asymptomatic individuals during a modified SLR. In addition it aimed to assess if demographic factors such as age or height affected the amount of nerve excursion available. The clinical interest of these values will be the comparison with symptomatic groups in future studies and the assessment of normal variation between individuals. In addition since the change in the initial position and second positions chosen (hip flexed to 30 and subsequently 60°) represent a more progressive SLR test, differences in amounts of nerve excursion between the 2 positions were explored. The results will add to the limited in vivo data available on excursion values during tensioners and sliders during SLR.

Section snippets

Subjects

Eighteen asymptomatic subjects (9 men, 9 women, mean age 28.9 (14.3), range 19–68 years) were recruited for the study. All subjects read an information sheet and signed a consent form prior to participating. Exclusion criteria included any neuromusculoskeletal conditions to the spine or lower limbs within the last year, systemic disorders such as rheumatoid arthritis and pregnancy. In addition, subjects were required to have normal neurological integrity test (detailed under procedure) and full

Results

The results from 2 subjects were excluded as the image quality was too poor for the motion analysis software to track longitudinal excursion of the nerve effectively. Table 1 shows the demographics of the remaining 16 subjects.

Discussion

This study demonstrates the wide variation in normative sciatic nerve excursion in both transverse and longitudinal planes. The most consistent transverse plane movement of the nerve during knee extension was superficial. Boyd et al. (2012) found a consistent superficial movement of the tibial nerve at the popliteal fossa during ankle dorsiflexion. The reason for this is unclear but could be related to relative positioning of the nerve to the femur or moving joint, or muscular effects on the

Conclusions

There is marked variability in the amount of longitudinal and transverse nerve movement between individuals. No significant association between age or height was found to explain these variations. A significant difference between the two positions was found indicating that with greater pre-loading, more nerve excursion occurred. This finding is in contrast to other studies which have demonstrated a decrease in excursion with preloading. However, only one aspect of the nerve was analysed, and it

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Kayleigh Quaife for her role as research assistant.

References (29)

  • J. Walsh et al.

    Reliability, validity and diagnostic accuracy of palpation of the sciatic, tibial and common peroneal nerves in the examination of low back related leg pain

    Manual Therapy

    (2009)
  • J.E. Bialosky et al.

    A randomised sham-controlled trial of a neurodynamic technique in the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome

    Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy

    (2009)
  • B.S. Boyd et al.

    Normal inter-limb differences during the straight leg raise neurodynamic test: a cross sectional study

    BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

    (2012)
  • B.S. Boyd et al.

    Mechanosensitivity of the lower extremity nervous system during straight leg raise neurodynamic testing in healthy individuals

    Journal of Orthopaedic and Sports Physical Therapy

    (2009)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Excursion of the median nerve during a contra-lateral cervical lateral glide movement in people with and without cervical radiculopathy

      2021, Musculoskeletal Science and Practice
      Citation Excerpt :

      It also suggests that taking the CCLG movement to the individual patient's end of range has a sufficient enough effect on median nerve excursions, irrespective of the absolute range of motion. This is in line with research on the sciatic nerve which also reported a large between-subject variation in nerve excursion during a modified straight leg raise (Ridehalgh et al., 2014). Another interesting finding was the discrepancy in outcome regarding disability between the NDI and the PSFS, compared to the health transition as assessed with the GPE.

    • Assessing the Reliability of Ultrasound Imaging to Examine Peripheral Nerve Excursion: A Systematic Literature Review

      2018, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Eighteen studies, including four studies identified from manual searching of the reference lists of eligible studies, met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final review. The study conducted by Ridehalgh et al. (2014) reported reliability data that were previously presented by the same group in 2012 (Ridehalgh et al. 2012). For this reason, the data reported in Ridehalgh et al. (2012) were reported in the current review without further inclusion of the 2014 study.

    • A modified straight leg raise test to differentiate between sural nerve pathology and Achilles tendinopathy. A cross-sectional cadaver study

      2015, Manual Therapy
      Citation Excerpt :

      In this test, dorsiflexion-inversion, which mechanically challenges both the sural nerve and Achilles tendon (Lyman et al., 2004; Wilmes and von Piekartz, 2010), is followed by hip flexion. As mechanical forces are transmitted and distributed along long sections of the nervous system (Coppieters et al., 2006; Ridehalgh et al., 2014), it is argued that hip flexion can increase the load on the sural nerve without loading the Achilles tendon (Butler, 2000). However, to date, there are no studies that evaluate whether hip flexion can increase the mechanical provocation of the sural nerve.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Work attributed to: Clinical Research Centre for Health Professions, University of Brighton, Aldro Building, 49 Darley Rd., Eastbourne, BN20 7UR, UK.

    View full text