Elsevier

Physiology & Behavior

Volume 201, 15 March 2019, Pages 123-129
Physiology & Behavior

Training load and well-being status variations of elite futsal players across a full season: Comparisons between normal and congested weeks

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.01.001Get rights and content

Abstract

The aim of this study was two-fold: (i) to analyze the variations of internal load (IL) and well-being between normal and congested weeks in professional futsal (also known as indoor soccer) players and (ii) to analyze variations in training days (MD-1, MD-2 and MD-3 [matchday −1, −2, and −3, respectively]) within weeks. Twenty male professional futsal players (age: 27.8 ± 5.7 years old; height: 173.8 ± 5.6 cm; weight: 71.5 ± 7.9 kg) that participated in the first futsal league of Portugal were monitored in all training sessions and matches during a full season. Session ratings of perceived exertion and a Hooper questionnaire (to measure muscle soreness, stress, fatigue, and sleep) were used to monitor the IL and well-being, respectively. Almost certain large decreases in IL during congested weeks in training session MD-3 were observed (−27.7%, [−35.8;−18.6]). Likely moderate decreases in IL during congested weeks in the MD-2 session were also verified (−9.9%, [−17.2;−2.0]). Regarding muscle soreness, almost certain large decreases were found during congested weeks on MD-3 (−21.2%, [−30.0;−11.3]) and MD-1 (−17.3%, [−26.6;−6.9]). Similar evidence was found for fatigue level, as almost certain large decreases were observed during congested weeks on MD-3 (−23.5%, [−32.9;−12.7]) and MD-1 (−16.6%, [−24.8;−7.4]). Within-week changes during normal weeks revealed almost certain large increases in internal load on MD-2 (93.4%, [78.6;109.3]) and MD-3 (106.7%, [88.2;127.0]) in comparison with MD-1. Also, during congested weeks, almost certain large increases of internal load were observed on MD-2 (77.2%, [53.4;104.7]) and MD-3 (65.7%, [42.8;92.3]) in comparison with MD-1. The major findings of this study revealed meaningful increases of IL, muscle soreness, and fatigue in normal weeks in comparison to congested ones. Within-week changes were also observed, with the greatest loads being observed on MD-3 during normal weeks and on MD-2 during congested weeks.

Introduction

The analysis of the effect of training stimuli on players has been progressively growing in the last decade in an attempt to identify loads imposed on players in team sports training sessions [1]. Knowledge about the real effects of the training load on players allows for the management of the variation of stimuli, the optimization of the training individualization, a reduction in injury risk, the early detection of bad overreaching, and the minimization of the possibility of overtraining syndrome [2]. Based on that, training monitoring is now a commonly used process during training sessions [3]. Usually, training load can be characterized as either internal or external [4]. Internal load describes the physiological effects of training (e.g., effects of heart rate, blood lactate concentrations, or perceived exertion). External load usually represents the physical impacts of training on players (e.g., distances covered at different speed thresholds, accelerations, decelerations, or jumps) [4].

The monitoring of training loads' consequences on players is also important [5]. For that reason, psychometric scales that track well-being perceptions of muscle soreness, fatigue, stress, sleep quality, and mood have been introduced in the context of team sports [6]. Training load and well-being are related and can be sensitive to different stressful periods during a season [7]. In the particular case of professional team sports, weeks with two or more matches may lead to different recovery and training strategies to minimize the effects of high loads in players, aiming to keep high performance and competitive levels [8,9]. Usually, these specific situations are called ‘congested weeks’ [10].

The effects of congested weeks on soccer players are well-documented [11,12], however no study have presented evidence about such topic on futsal, as far we know. Futsal (also treated as five-side indoor football in some countries) is a high-intensity intermittent sport with a high frequency of accelerations/decelerations, changes of direction and speed [13]. It is usually found during matches values around 90% of maximal heart rate during 70% of the playing time and very small periods of low-intensity or rest [14]. The research on training load quantification on futsal have been increasing in the last years [15,16], however, as far we know, there is no study comparing normal versus congested weeks. In the case of soccer, some findings on the topic reveal no meaningful changes in match performance, possibly because of the high capacity of professional players to cope with these stressful periods [17]. However, congested weeks seem to significantly increase the risk of injury during soccer match play (43.3 injury rate per 1000 h exposure) in comparison to non-congested period (18.6 injury rate per 1000 h exposure) [10], promote changes in well-being perceptions of soccer players (namely, significantly increasing the muscle soreness, fatigue and stress perception) [5], and lead to meaningful changes in the collective organization of the soccer teams [12].

In the particular case of futsal [18], the training periodization in conditions of high load has been reported [19,20]. In a study conducted in twelve elite young players, it was found that during a 4-week period of intensive training, there was a progressive decrease in weekly training load [20], although there were no meaningful changes in salivary immunoglobulin A or salivary cortisol. Interestingly, in that study, there was an increase in upper respiratory tract infection [20]. In another study which was conducted on female players, it was found that levels between ~343 and ~419 AU (arbitrary units) were associated with an increase in stress symptoms and levels above ~435 AU were associated with a decrease in stress and hormonal markers [21]. Only regarding the training load was it found that the perception is inversely and largely correlated with aerobic capacity; for that reason, a better fitness level may reduce the negative effects of high-load periods on players [22].

While studies have analyzed the effects of congested periods in futsal players, how training load varies between normal and congested weeks has not been tested, to the best of our knowledge. Such an analysis may help to characterize the periodization profile and how it may vary based on the specific stressful context. Moreover, within-week changes in training load and well-being have been analyzed in only one study, as far we know [23]. The within-week training load and well-being changes may also be important for identifying the effects of training load in the posterior well-being status. Based on these limitations and opportunities, the purpose of this study was two-fold: (i) to analyze the variations of internal load (IL) and well-being between normal and congested weeks in professional futsal players and (ii) to analyze the variations of training days (MD-1, MD-2, and MD-3 [matchday −1, −2, and − 3, respectively]) within weeks. We hypothesize that the MD-1 will present the lower load in both type of weeks and that normal weeks will present greater loads per each training day.

Section snippets

Participants

Twenty male professional futsal players (age: 27.8 ± 5.7 years old; height: 173.8 ± 5.6 cm; weight: 71.5 ± 7.9 kg) that participated in the first futsal league of Portugal were monitored in training sessions and matches during a full season. For players to be included in the data analysis, they had to meet the following criteria: (i) They must have participated in >80% of weekly training sessions, and (ii) they must have begun the week with medical clearance to compete. An additional criterion

Results

Comparisons of perceived load and Hooper categories between normal and congested weeks can be found in Table 2.

Fig. 1 presents the standardized differences of perceived categories between training days during normal weeks. Analysis of variation was made by using standardized differences (Cohen).

Fig. 2 presents the standardized differences of perceived categories between training days during congested weeks. Analysis of variation was made by using standardized differences (Cohen).

Discussion

One main purpose of this study was to compare perceived internal load and well-being in normal weeks vs. congested weeks. The results revealed that internal load (session-RPE) on MD-3 was largely greater in normal weeks than in congested weeks. Despite of some research in training load on futsal [15,16], there is no study comparing within-weeks variations, in the best of our knowledge. However, in the case of soccer has found that mid-week sessions are usually higher in terms of the load

Conclusions

The main evidence of this experiment revealed that normal weeks lead to large increases in muscle soreness and fatigue on all studied training days and that internal load is moderately higher on MD-2 and largely higher on MD-1 during normal weeks than during congested ones. Within-weeks observations during normal weeks revealed that MD-1 had a largely lower internal load than other days and that MD-3 had largely lower muscle soreness and fatigue levels than other days. In the case of congested

References (43)

  • M. Haddad et al.

    Influence of fatigue, stress, muscle soreness and sleep on perceived exertion during submaximal effort

    Physiol. Behav.

    (2013 Jul)
  • F.M. Clemente et al.

    Internal training load and its longitudinal relationship with seasonal player wellness in elite professional soccer

    Physiol. Behav.

    (2017 Oct)
  • P.C. Bourdon et al.

    Monitoring athlete training loads: consensus statement

    Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform.

    (2017 Apr)
  • T.J. Gabbett et al.

    The athlete monitoring cycle: a practical guide to interpreting and applying training monitoring data

    Br. J. Sports Med.

    (2017 Jun 23)
  • T. Soligard et al.

    How much is too much? (Part 1) International Olympic Committee consensus statement on load in sport and risk of injury

    Br. J. Sports Med.

    (2016 Sep)
  • S.L. Halson et al.

    Sport Med.

    (2014 Sep 9)
  • F.M. Clemente et al.

    Internal training load and its longitudinal relationship with seasonal player wellness in elite professional soccer

    Physiol. Behav.

    (2017)
  • A.E. Saw et al.

    Monitoring the athlete training response: subjective self-reported measures trump commonly used objective measures: a systematic review

    Br. J. Sports Med.

    (2016 Mar)
  • M.K. Drew et al.

    The relationship between training load and injury, illness and soreness: a systematic and literature review

    Sport Med.

    (2016 Jun 28)
  • A. Moreira et al.

    Effect of a congested match schedule on immune-endocrine responses, technical performance and session-RPE in elite youth soccer players

    J. Sports Sci.

    (2016 Jul 8)
  • H. Sarmento et al.

    What performance analysts need to know about research trends in association football (2012–2016): a systematic review

    Sport Med.

    (2018 Apr 14)
  • A. Dellal et al.

    The effects of a congested fixture period on physical performance, technical activity and injury rate during matches in a professional soccer team

    Br. J. Sports Med.

    (2015 Mar)
  • C. Lago-Peñas et al.

    The influence of a congested calendar on physical performance in elite soccer

    J. Strength Cond. Res.

    (2011 Aug)
  • H. Folgado et al.

    The effects of congested fixtures period on tactical and physical performance in elite football

    J. Sports Sci.

    (2015 Jul 21)
  • M. Beato et al.

    Brief review of the state of art in futsal

    J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness

    (2016)
  • J.C. Barbero-Alvarez et al.

    Match analysis and heart rate of futsal players during competition

    J. Sports Sci.

    (2008 Jan)
  • F.N. Rabelo et al.

    Monitoring the intended and perceived training load of a professional futsal team over 45 weeks

    J. Strength Cond. Res.

    (2016 Jan)
  • B. Miloski et al.

    Seasonal training load distribution of professional futsal players

    J. Strength Cond. Res.

    (2016 Jun)
  • C. Carling et al.

    Monitoring of post-match fatigue in professional soccer: welcome to the real world

    Sport Med.

    (2018 May 8)
  • H. Sarmento et al.

    The transition from match analysis to intervention: optimising the coaching process in elite futsal

    Int. J. Perform. Anal. Sport.

    (2015 Aug 3)
  • V.H. Freitas et al.

    Sensitivity of physiological and psychological markers to training load intensification in volleyball players

    J. Sports Sci. Med.

    (2014)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text