Elsevier

Research in Developmental Disabilities

Volume 30, Issue 6, November–December 2009, Pages 1124-1131
Research in Developmental Disabilities

The effect of vibration on postural response of Down syndrome individuals on the seesaw

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ridd.2009.02.012Get rights and content

Abstract

In order to better understand the role of proprioception in postural adjustments on unstable surfaces, we analyzed the effect of vibration on the pattern of muscle activity and joint displacements (ankle, knee and hip) of eight intellectually normal participants (control group—CG) and eight individuals with Down syndrome (DS) while balancing on seesaws of different heights. The individuals with DS adopted a pattern of co-contraction and were not able to modulate the magnitude of postural response with the seesaw's height. The vibration affected neither the ability of individuals with DS to maintain balance nor the pattern of muscle contraction. On the other hand the control group changed the strategy with vibration, adopting one similar to that used by individuals with DS. Collectively, our findings suggest that proprioceptive information is essential for the motor control system to select the appropriate motor strategy of reciprocal activation among the agonist and antagonist to efficiently balance. Also, these findings suggest that a proprioceptive deficit could explain the atypical motor strategy observed in individuals with DS during balance on seesaw.

Section snippets

Participants

Eight individuals with DS (four males, four females, average age 28.1 ± 4.22 years, average weight 65.3 ± 6.97 kg) and eight age and sex-matched controls (CG) (average age 27.5 ± 5.68, weight 64.3 ± 8.9) were studied after their parents had signed an institutional (UNICAMP) term of informed consent, which was approved by the University of Campinas Ethics Committee, indicating that this study was conducted in accordance with relevant ethical principles. All individuals with DS had good hearing, were able

Results

Fig. 2 shows muscle activation patterns of the gastrocnemius medialis (GM), tibialis anterior (TA) and ankle joint displacement of one control individual and one with DS while balancing on a seesaw 12 cm in height, with and without vibration. The control individual maintained balance using a reciprocal pattern of muscle activation characterized by alternation between ankle agonist and antagonist muscles. The shortcoming of this pattern of muscle activity was observed with vibration of the

Discussion

As previously reported on the seesaw, a typical muscle strategy is used (Almeida, Carvalho, & Talis 2006). This strategy is characterized by balance mainly by the ankle joint with an alternating activation of the TA and GM muscles and by modulating these muscle responses with the degree of the seesaw stability. In this sense, the results presented here by control group are consistent with previous findings.

The vibration of the Achilles tendon decreased the muscle activity and ankle displacement

Conclusion

The individuals with DS adopted less efficient kinematic and EMG strategy to maintain balance on the seesaw. This strategy was not affected by vibration. On the other hand, the control group changed the strategy with vibration, adopting one similar to that used by individuals with DS. Collectively, our findings suggest that proprioceptive information is essential for the motor control system to select the appropriate motor strategy of reciprocal activation among the agonist and antagonist to

Acknowledgement

Authors thank FAPESP - FUNDAÇÃO DE AMPARO À PESQUISA DO ESTADO DE SÃO PAULO for financial support - (grant no. 98/06866-8).

References (24)

  • G.L. Almeida et al.

    Postural strategy to keep balance on the seesaw

    Gait and Posture

    (2006)
  • A.S. Aruin et al.

    A coactivation strategy in anticipatory postural adjustments in person with Down syndrome

    Motor Control

    (1997)
  • U. Bellugi et al.

    Neuropsychological, neurological, and neuroanatomical profile of Williams syndrome

    American Journal of Medical Genetics

    (1990)
  • B.R. Bloem et al.

    Propriocepsis in the lower legs: Is it essential for triggering human balance corrections

    Experimental Brain Research

    (2000)
  • B.R. Brandt et al.

    Impaired peripheral somatosensory function in children with Down syndrome

    Neuropediatrics

    (1995)
  • Carvalho, R. L., & Almeida, G. L. (2009). Assessment of postural adjustments in persons with intellectual disability...
  • K.J. Cole et al.

    Deficits in the production of grip force in Down syndrome

    Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology

    (1988)
  • B.L. Day et al.

    Human body-segment tilts induced by galvanic stimulation: A vestibularly driven balance protection mechanism

    Journal of Physiology

    (1997)
  • R.C. Fitzpatrick et al.

    Task-dependent reflex responses and movement illusions evoked by galvanic vestibular stimulation in standing humans

    Journal of Physiology

    (1994)
  • M. Galli et al.

    Postural control in patients with Down syndrome

    Disability Rehabilitation

    (2007)
  • M.M. Gomes et al.

    Postural control in Down syndrome: The use of somatosensory and visual information to attenuate body sway

    Motor Control

    (2007)
  • V. Hatzitaki et al.

    The integration of multiple proprioceptive information: Effect of ankle tendon vibration on postural responses to platform tilt. Experimental

    Brain Research

    (2004)
  • Cited by (13)

    • Role of treadmill training versus suspension therapy on balance in children with Down syndrome

      2012, Egyptian Journal of Medical Human Genetics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Improvement fulfilled in the study groups I and II might be attributed to the effect of exercises therapy program for balance and postural control. This agrees with the findings of Carvalho and Almeida [31] who suggested that proprioceptive information is essential for the motor control system to select the appropriate motor strategy of reciprocal activation among the agonist and antagonist to efficiently maintain balance. Significant difference was observed when comparing the post-treatment results of the two groups in the favor of the study group II receiving suspension therapy via using spider cage.

    • The effect of galvanic vestibular stimulation on postural response of Down syndrome individuals on the seesaw

      2011, Research in Developmental Disabilities
      Citation Excerpt :

      Also the GVS affected neither the ability of CG individuals to maintain balance nor the alternated pattern of muscle contraction. The results presented here by CG and by individuals with DS without GVS are consistent with previous findings (Almeida, Carvalho, & Talis, 2006; Carvalho & Almeida, 2009a, 2009b). The CG maintained their balance mainly by the ankle joint with an alternating activation of the TA and GM muscles.

    • Postural strategies in Prader-Willi and Down syndrome patients

      2011, Research in Developmental Disabilities
      Citation Excerpt :

      PWS were in fact characterised by values closer to normal than DS and were able to walk with a more “stable” strategy (Cimolin et al., 2010). Postural analysis has also been investigated mainly in DS (Carvalho & Almeida, 2009; Galli, Rigoldi, Mainardi et al., 2008; Shumway-Cook & Woollacott, 1985; Webber, Virji-Babul, Edwards, & Lesperance, 2004) and, to our knowledge, only one study was conducted on PWS patients (Capodaglio et al., 2010). According to this literature, both DS and PWS are characterised by a reduced postural control, as measured by center of pressure displacement (CoP) and postural sway velocity.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text