Journal Information
Vol. 53. Issue 199.
Pages 113-122 (July - September 2018)
Vol. 53. Issue 199.
Pages 113-122 (July - September 2018)
Original Article
Full text access
Quality of recommendations on health-enhancing physical activity in the press. Content analysis of five Spanish newspapers
Calidad de las recomendaciones sobre actividad física saludable en la prensa. Análisis del contenido de cinco periódicos españoles
Juanjo Garcia-Gila,b,
Corresponding author

Corresponding author.
, Sergi Cortiñas-Rovirac
a Fundació Tecnocampus Mataró-Maresme – Health Sciences School, Avinguda Ernest Lluch, 32 08302 Mataró, Spain
b University Pompeu Fabra – Department of Communication – GRECC (Grup de Recerca en Comunicació Científica), Carrer de Roc Boronat, 138, 08018 Barcelona, Spain
c Head of Research Group, University Pompeu Fabra – Department of Communication – GRECC (Grup de Recerca en Comunicació Científica), Carrer de Roc Boronat, 138, 08018 Barcelona, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Download PDF
Figures (1)
Tables (5)
Table 1. Analyzed variables.
Table 2. Quality scores (0-10) and distribution of frequencies of the sample (n=100).
Table 3. Percentage of satisfaction of quality variables.
Table 4. Characteristics of the themes in the sample (n=100).
Table 5. Comparison of scientific quality with prior studies (percentage of criteria satisfaction for each variable).
Show moreShow less

The pandemic of physical inactivity causes millions of early deaths globally. However, inactivity can be reversed if more and better information is made available. While the number of news stories on health and health-enhancing physical activity (HEPA) has increased globally and also in Spain, various studies show that the quality of these articles is often questionable.


Content analysis was used to analyze twelve quality variables from the scientific and media perspectives and five variables about the themes in news stories on HEPA published in five Spanish general-interest newspapers in the years 2013 and 2014: El País; El Mundo; La Vanguardia; ABC; and El Periódico.


The average score of quality of news stories (n=100) is 6.3 (s=1.9) on a scale from 0 to 10. The percentages of satisfactory quality variables are: medicalization (96%); objectivity (94%); sources (80%); context (62%); credibility (61%); availability (54%); novelty (52%); truthfulness (43%); alternatives (26%); emotion (20%); accessible language (19%); and magnitude (19%).


The average quality of the newspaper articles on HEPA is intermediate. Further work is required, particularly regarding the following variables: alternatives; emotion; accessible language; and magnitude. Suggestions to improve journalistic practice and scientific dissemination (sources) are accordingly included.

Health promotion
Public health
Life style
Health literacy
Mass media

La inactividad física es una pandemia que provoca mundialmente millones de muertes prematuras, pero es un hábito que puede modificarse aumentando la cantidad y la calidad de la información disponible. En España y en el mundo, las noticias publicadas en los periódicos sobre salud y actividad física saludable (AFS) han aumentado, pero su calidad es cuestionable, según muestran varios estudios.


Se utiliza la técnica de análisis del contenido para analizar 12 variables de calidad desde las perspectivas comunicativa y científica en noticias sobre AFS publicadas en los periódicos generalistas con mayor difusión en España (2013-2014): El País, El Mundo, La Vanguardia, ABC y El Periódico.


La calidad de las noticias (n=100) obtiene una nota media de 6,3 puntos (s=1,9) en una escala de 0 a 10. Las variables satisfacen heterogéneamente la calidad; de mayor a menor: medicalización (96%); objetividad (94%); fuentes (80%); contexto (62%); credibilidad (61%); disponibilidad (54%); novedad (52%); veracidad (43%); alternativas (26%); emoción (20%); lenguaje divulgativo (19%), y magnitud (19%).


Aunque la calidad media de las noticias sobre AFS no es baja, existe un amplio margen de mejora. Sobre todo, en algunas de las variables analizadas para las que se aportan unas recomendaciones para la práctica periodística y para las fuentes de información científicas y profesionales.

Palabras clave:
Promoción de la salud
Salud pública
Estilo de vida
Alfabetización de la salud
Medios de comunicación
Full Text

Physical inactivity is the fourth risk factor of early death globally1 because it increases the risk of several non-communicable diseases.2–4 Inactivity was related to 5 million deaths in 2008, i.e., 8% of global mortality.1 The pandemic of physical inactivity persists and is considered a significant public health issue.4 Indeed, it is calculated that the levels of physical activity of 60% adults and 81.4% teenagers are insufficient.4,5 In 2010 the WHO published the Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health,6 which focus on the weekly physical activity needed to attain the health benefits of exercise.7 Physical activity can take place in different everyday life settings: home, transport, occupation (school, college and workplace) and leisure time.

Theoretical framework

Physical activity is a health habit that can be significantly modified if information is more widely disseminated.8 The strategies to fight physical inactivity, usually paired with diet recommendations, should include different intervention phases based on social marketing and in models and theories that originate from the social sciences. All these propositions entail a prior essential requirement, i.e., to properly advice the population9 in order to achieve behavioral change toward lifestyles that are sufficiently active.10

The use of the media might prove effective to enhance the health of the population.11 Agenda-setting theory attributes more influence to the written press than to television in determining the items that will feature in the media.12 However, the intermediation between scientists and the general population has disappeared in most cases in Spain and globally. Thus, the regulatory role of the press in the search for truth and objectivity appears to be missing.13 In Spain, the financial crisis that started in 2008 resulted in a lack of resources for quality journalism reporting on science and health.14,15

Nevertheless, there is still a high volume of news articles with specialized health contents in the Spanish press.16 The number of news stories on health-enhancing physical activity (HEPA) has also increased.17 However, serious research and significant advances in health and medicine still only feature in a small percentage of publications.18

To our knowledge, no study has applied the Oxman Index, specifically validated19 to measure the scientific quality of the news stories on health in the press. A study by Moynihan et al.20 is considered groundbreaking and was followed by various international initiatives (Australia, Canada, USA, Germany, China and Japan) that use criteria based on the Oxman Index.21 The most significant initiative in terms of number of news stories analyzed is the Health News Review, which started its activity in 2006 in the USA. After the analysis of approximately 3000 news stories, some of these initiatives22–24 reveal lack of rigor and thoroughness in relation to the original finding.

In consequence, we believe that this content analysis25–27 of news stories on HEPA published in the Spanish press is timely. The objective of the research is to assess the conformity to quality criteria with the aim to generate tools for journalists to create improved news stories. The research questions (RQ) raised are as follows:

  • RQ1. – What is the quality of news stories on HEPA in Spain?

  • RQ2. – From the media and scientific perspectives, to which degree are the quality variables of the news stories on HEPA in Spain satisfactory?

  • RQ3. – To which degree are the quality variables satisfactory compared to the results of international quality analysis in health news stories?

  • RQ4. – What is the correspondence between the topics in the news stories and government strategies to achieve change in the habits of the population?

  • RQ5. – How are the topics explained in relation to the setting, age groups, risk factors and prevalence of non-communicable diseases?

MethodologySelection of variables

Quality variables were selected according to criteria described in several essays and applied to various scientific articles. These criteria concern the media and scientific perspectives, namely: specialized journalism28–30; ethical principles of journalism31; emotional communication regarding health issues32; and rigor in reporting scientific and health topics.19,21 A total of 12 variables were defined for the quality analysis of these two perspectives (media and science) and 5 variables for the thematic description of the contents (Table 1).

Table 1.

Analyzed variables.

QualityCharacteristics of the themes 
Communicative  Both  Scientific   
Context  Truthfulness  Magnitude  Source of story 
Sources  Credibility  Medicalization  Setting of PA 
Accessible language    Alternatives  Target age group 
Objectivity    Availability  Specific diseases 
Emotion    Novelty  Recommendations included 
Object of study and sampling

The units of analysis are the news stories on HEPA published during 2013 and 2014 in the five general-interest newspapers with the largest readership in Spain: El País, El Mundo, La Vanguardia, ABC and El Periódico de Catalunya.

We used the news database MyNews Online, which provides the articles published in the written press (paper) in Portable Document Format (PDF), the news database LexisNexis and the online newspaper archive of ABC for the news stories not found in MyNews Online for the study period. The search keywords were “physical activity” and “physical exercise” for the period defined in the national editions of these five newspapers. All sections of the newspapers were screened, including opinion and sponsored articles,b and also the supplements and special features incorporated within the newspapers for a fixed price per unit. The inclusion criteria with regard to the topic of the news story were: recommendations on HEPA or HEPA plus diet, articles on HEPA or HEPA plus diet, studies on the prevalence of a specific condition or risk factor, prevention and/or health promotion programs and techniques, new fitness trends and technology applied to physical activity (PA).

Definition and satisfactory criteria of quality variables

  • 1.

    Context: data to support that the main facts do not occur in isolation, but related to other facts, including past and present information.

  • 2.

    Sources: the sources must have a citation in the article, including name, affiliation, specialty and lack of conflicts of interest; when more than a source exists, all of them should be mentioned. If there is a press release, it should only contribute toward the context of the story.

  • 3.

    Accessible language: when there is specialized language, the scientific contents should be explained with plain language accessible to most readers without having to consult other sources.

  • 4.

    Objectivity: facts and data should be clearly differentiated from opinions. Generally, in this type of news stories the opinion of the journalist should not be in the text.

  • 5.

    Emotion: the inclusion of elements that stir emotion in the reader is one of the most promising areas of communication. These elements can be witnesses’ quotations and persuasive narrative.

  • 6.

    Truthfulness: this variable depends on others such as context, sources, objectivity, credibility and magnitude. Truthfulness evaluates the rigor of the story in relation to the original source (scientific article or report).

  • 7.

    Credibility: mention of scientific evidence. The study, journal or institution that publishes the scientific finding should be specified; also, that the personal sources are from experts on the matter.

  • 8.

    Magnitude: the relevance or scope of the findings must be clearly stated, without exaggerating or lessening risks and benefits. Qualitative data are less informative because of their ambiguity and subjectivity, whereas numeric data (absolute and relative) provide specific information.

  • 9.

    Medicalization: risk factors should not be equated to a disease and natural processes such as aging cannot be presented as a health issue; medication cannot be presented without the alternative of physical exercise when there is scientific evidence that favors exercise.

  • 10.

    Alternatives: to evaluate a new treatment or HEPA recommendation available alternatives of proven efficacy should be presented. Even better if advantages and disadvantages are compared.

  • 11.

    Availability: the article should mention if the program, treatment or HEPA recommendation are available in the country, if professional monitoring and specific gear are required and costs incurred.

  • 12.

    Novelty: explains if the HEPA recommendation method, program or treatment are really new and if it is a reformulation of an old concept or a variation of an existing idea.

Technique used

We used content analysis, a quantitative technique based on the objective reading and coding of the information contained in each news story (unit of analysis). Coding ascribes one unit of analysis within a specific category of a variable.27 Next, these variables were successively computed, described, analyzed and given a dichotomous value: satisfactory=1; non satisfactory=0; or “not applicable” according to the criteria (quality variables). The total number of applicable items is not the same for all news stories and therefore the results are not comparable if they are not standardized, for instance with a scale from 0 to 10. The formulae applied are as follows:

For each news story:

For each quality variable:

The result is a score (0-10) for each news story of the sample and 12 scores (0-10) for each quality variable observed.

Data management

The database was created with the program Filemaker Pro Advance (version 14.0.6) and the data were processed with Microsoft Excel for Mac (version 14.7.1) and IBM SPSS Statistics (version 21).

ResultsSample descriptors (Table 2)

The sample analyzed (n=100) presents a similar annual distribution, 46% (n=46) for 2013 and 54% (n=54) for 2014. More stories were published during the first half of the year, peaking in May for both 2013 (21%; n=21) and 2014 (13%; n=13). The frequency according to the day of the week is also very similar in the two years of the study. The newspaper La Vanguardia contributes almost half of the news stories (n=45; 45%), while the remaining 55% (n=55) is similarly distributed among the other four newspapers with percentages ranging from 11% to 17%. Most articles feature in the section “Society-Trends”, followed by the supplements (35%; n=35). These two sections accumulate 81% (n=81) of the news stories published.

Table 2.

Quality scores (0-10) and distribution of frequencies of the sample (n=100).

  Mean  s.d.  n 
2013  6.3  1.8  46  46.0 
2014  6.3  2.0  54  54.0 
July to December  6.3  1.7  63  63.0 
January to June  6.2  2.0  37  37.0 
Wednesday  7.1  1.1  13  13.0 
Monday  6.6  1.2  7.0 
Thursday  6.6  1.4  12  12.0 
Saturday  6.2  2.1  29  29.0 
Tuesday  6.0  2.4  27  27.0 
Friday  5.5  2.4  4.0 
Sunday  5.3  1.3  8.0 
El País  7.0  1.7  11  11.0 
La Vanguardia  6.8  1.8  45  45.0 
El Periódico  5.6  2.3  17  17.0 
ABC  5.6  1.7  12  12.0 
El Mundo  5.4  1.5  15  15.0 
Society – Trendsa  6.8  1.7  46  46.0 
Otherb  6.7  2.0  8.0 
Science  6.6  0.9  5.0 
Local  6.2  1.2  6.0 
Supplements  5.4  2.1  35  35.0 

s.d., standard deviation.


The section “Trends” in the newspaper La Vanguardia is the same as the section “Society” in the other newspapers.


Feature Article (4), Opinion (2), Technology (1), Special Features (1)

Quality of the news stories (Table 2; Fig. 1)

The total quality of the whole sample (n=100) is 6.3 (s=1.9) on a scale of 0-10 (0=lowest score; 10=highest score). We did not find differences between 2013 (x¯=6.3; s=1.8) and 2014 (x¯=6.3; s=2.0) or between the first (x¯=6.2; s=2.0) and second (x¯=6.4; s=1.7) half of the year. The differences observed in relation to the days of the week are not significant, since 75% (n=75) of the sample is accumulated in three days which present scores close to the mean. However, El País (x¯=7.0; s=1.7) and La Vanguardia (x¯=6.8; s=1.8) obtained higher scores, followed by El Periódico (x¯=5.6; s=2.3), ABC (x¯=5.6; s=1.7) and El Mundo (x¯=5.4; σ=1.5).

Figure 1.

Quality of the news stories by categories.


As a whole, 72% news stories obtained a score of 5.0 or over. Fig. 1 shows the distribution by categories (low=0-4.9; intermediate=5-6.9; high=7-8.9; very high=9-10).

Satisfactory scores of quality variables (Table 3)

Table 3 shows the satisfactory scores obtained by the quality variables and the percentage of stories to which the criteria have not been applied due to different reasons. The scores (scale 0-10) calculated for comparison and the results according to categories of quality are as follows: very high: Objectivity (9.7) and Medicalization (9.6); high: Sources (8.0), Truthfulness (7.5) and Credibility (7.4); intermediate: Availability (6.6), Novelty (6.5) and Context (6.2); low: Accessible Language (4.2), Alternatives (3.8), Emotion (2.0) and Magnitude (2.1).

Table 3.

Percentage of satisfaction of quality variables.

  Satisfactory  Non satisfactory  Not applicable 
Medicalization  96%  4%  – 
Objectivity  94%  4%  2% 
Sources  80%  20%  – 
Context  62%  38%  – 
Credibility  61%  22%  17% 
Availability  54%  28%  18% 
Novelty  52%  28%  20% 
Truthfulness  43%  14%  43% 
Alternatives  26%  43%  31% 
Emotion  20%  80%  – 
Accessible language  19%  26%  55% 
Magnitude  19%  73%  8% 
Total  52.0%  31.6%  16.4% 
Characteristics of the themes (Table 4)

The themes of the stories are represented in similar frequencies. At the highest end we found “Recommendations on HEPA or HEPA plus diet” (19%; n=19) and at the lowest end (4%; n=4) the stories on “Technology applied to physical activity”.

Table 4.

Characteristics of the themes in the sample (n=100).

Source of story
Recommendations on HEPA or HEPA plus diet  35  35.0 
Prevalence study  17  17.0 
Prevention program/technique  16  16.0 
Article on HEPA or HEPA plus diet  16  16.0 
New trends in fitness  12  12.0 
Technology applied to PA  4.0 
Setting of PA
Leisure  28  28.0 
Occupationala  12  12.0 
Household  2.0 
Transport  2.0 
Not mentioned  56  56.0 
Target age group
Adults (18-64 years)  16  16.0 
Young (5-17 years)  11  11.0 
Children (<5 years)  6.0 
Elderly (65 years and over)  4.0 
Not specified  63  63.0 
Specific diseases
Obesity  25  25.0 
Type 2 diabetes  3.0 
Osteoarthritis  2.0 
Heart disease  2.0 
Otherb  6.0 
Not specified  62  62.0 
Yes  65  65.0 
No  35  35.0 

Work (5), School (4) and University (3).


Hypertension (1), Depression (1), Osteoporosis(1), Cancer(1), Technology addiction (1) and Exercise addiction (1).

The settings are only mentioned in 44% of stories (n=44), with a prominent first place for “Leisure” (28%; n=28). In relation to the age group of the target population, 63% (n=63) of stories do not specify any.

Obesity is the disease that features most frequently (25%; n=25) as the main condition. However, 62% (n=62) of articles do not focus on any specific disease. The remaining news stories (13%; n=13) correspond to various diseases with percentages that range from 1% to 3%.

Finally, we have observed that while there are specific recommendations on health-enhancing physical activity in 65% (n=65) of news stories, a decrease of 16.5% occurred in 2014 (57.4%; n=31) compared to 2013 (73.9%; n=34).

DiscussionRQ1. – What is the quality of news stories on HEPA in Spain?

The quality of the news stories analyzed (2013-2014) is very homogeneous. For the whole study period, the average score obtained is of intermediate quality, i.e., 6.3 (s=1.9) on a scale from 0 to 10. Specifically, 79% have either intermediate (n=40), high (n=32) or very high quality (n=7), with the remaining 21% obtaining low quality scores (n=21). This variability underscores that readers are frequently exposed to vague and incomplete recommendations on HEPA.

RQ2. – To which degree are the quality variables of the news stories on HEPA in Spain satisfactory?

The performance of journalists in relation to objectivity and avoiding medicalization is excellent. The variables with a high quality (score=7-8.9) show that most stories maintain the scientific rigor of the source study or report and also that they include information on the sources, which adds scientific credibility to the news story. The variables with an intermediate quality (score=5-6.9) show that the stories could be greatly improved by a greater contextualization of the main topic of the article, by specifying the availability of the method or technique and by clarifying the novelty factor. Low quality scores (<5) imply the following shortcomings:

  • -

    The language of these stories is not sufficiently accessible to be understood by most people. Frequently, the technicalities included are ill-explained.

  • -

    The main information is insufficiently contextualized, in particular in relation to the presentation of available alternatives.

  • -

    Very few news stories use narrative resources that stir emotion in the reader while informing. Emotion contributes to enhance understanding and recollection of the information.

  • -

    Most writings do not show data that quantify benefits and possible risks related to the HEPA.

RQ3. – From a scientific perspective, to which degree are the quality variables satisfactory compared to the results of international quality analysis in health news stories?

If we take into account that our study only analyses news stories on HEPA, we believe that it is of value to compare these results with the scientific perspective of other studies of content analysis in the press which include also articles on HEPA. Table 5 shows the main characteristics of the articles and the results of criteria satisfaction. The characteristics of these three studies on the USA, Australia and Canada initiatives are very similar. In relation to quality, they find the same trends observed in our study. With the exception of the criterion “Novelty”, which has the highest variability (intermediate, high or very high), the quality grading of the remaining four criteria coincides in the four studies:

  • 1)

    Very high quality: Medicalization (96–70%).

  • 2)

    High quality: Availability (70–54%).

  • 3)

    Intermediate quality: Alternatives (51–26%).

  • 4)

    Low quality: Magnitude (31–19%).

Table 5.

Comparison of scientific quality with prior studies (percentage of criteria satisfaction for each variable).

Study  Current study  Schwitzer22, 2013  Wilson24, 2009  Cassels23, 2008 
Country  Spain  USA  Australia  Canada 
Period  2013-2014  2006-2013  2005-2008  2005-2006 
Media  Newspaper  Newspapers; TV  Newspapers; TV; Radio  Newspapers; TV; Radio 
Channel  Paper  Websitesa  Websites  Websites 
Audience  General public  General public  General public  General and professional public 
Sample (n)  100  1675  1230  87 
Medicalization  96%  70%  89%  90% 
Availability  54%  70%  56%  62% 
Novelty  52%  85%  83%  94% 
Alternatives  26%  38%  51%  43% 
Magnitude  19%  31%b  27%b  20%b 

During the first 3.5 years they also analyzed the news broadcast by the channels ABC, CBS and NBC.


Arithmetic mean between the percentages of magnitude of benefits and possible risks.

RQ4. – What is the correspondence between the topics in the news stories and government strategies to achieve change in the habits of the population?

Over two thirds (68%) of the stories originate in studies on the prevalence of a disease or risk factor, mainly sedentarism and overweight/obesity, studies on the effects of HEPA or HEPA plus diet and recommendations on HEPA or HEPA plus diet. This high proportion corresponds to the fundamental and priority contents of strategies aimed at behavioral change,10 which start by raising awareness on the severity of physical inactivity (prevalence studies) followed by information on how to fight this problem (recommendations and/or benefits of HEPA plus diet) while explaining the adaptive processes that take place in the body with scientific studies.

RQ5. – How are the topics explained in relation to the setting, age groups, risk factors and prevalence of non-communicable diseases?

The distribution of settings within the news stories shows that in 56% of cases there is no mention of any specific setting that the reader can identify with and therefore understand the implications of the information for herself. When a setting is mentioned (44%), it mainly refers to leisure time (28%) and the remaining 16% is distributed between household, transport and work or education (school and university). This is relevant, since the reader might interpret that these recommendations can only be followed during leisure time. Moreover, if we consider that there are only clear recommendations on HEPA in 65% of news stories, the possibilities for the reader to locate her own reality in the information that she reads decreases even further. Similarly, the age group of the population targeted by the information and recommendations should be clearly specified, since the activities vary in accordance with age.6

Correspondingly, we only find references to diseases in 38% (n=38) of texts. Obesity is the main condition, with 25% (n=25) of stories, while other diseases are distributed in the remaining 13% (n=13). It is obvious that this distribution does not represent the diversity and importance of diseases and risk factors in Spain and globally. Hypertension and hyperglycemia are risk factors that cause more mortality than obesity1 and they only feature in 4% of news stories, in contrast with 25% of overweight and obesity. We should also highlight the scant information on prevention of breast and colon cancer (1%), taking into account that scientific evidence shows that HEPA could help prevent between 21% and 25% of these types of cancer.1


The news stories from the years 2013 and 2014 analyzed in this study have an average quality of 6.3 on a scale from 0 to 10. While we consider this a rather positive result, further efforts to improve these scores are crucially needed, in particular in view of the wide dispersion of scores obtained for the quality variables from the media and scientific perspectives.

The results from the scientific perspective (Medicalization, Availability, Novelty, Alternatives and Magnitude) are very similar to previous studies on content analysis carried out by different international groups of the USA, Australia and Canada.

Regarding the characteristics of the themes, we consider that the diversity and proportion of sources (scientific articles, prevalence studies, recommendations and benefits of HEPA) are well represented in the study sample. In contrast, little mention is made of the various settings where HEPA can be practiced and of recommendations on HEPA. Moreover, the diseases associated with physical inactivity are poorly represented in the news stories. Indeed, two thirds do not include any information about diseases and when a condition is mentioned the articles focus mainly on overweight and obesity. We should underscore this absence of information on diseases, since current literature shows at least 36 conditions that can be prevented or treated with a carefully designed program of physical exercise.33,34

Implications for journalistic practice and dissemination by scientific and professional sources

The results of this research reveal that without additional time burden, the news stories could be greatly improved by following these recommendations:


1) When the origin of the news story is a scientific study or a report, data must be provided to identify the source, i.e., the full title, the main author and the journal. The date of publishing must always be included.

Stirring the reader's emotions

2) Whenever possible, the reader must identify with the story: witnesses can be the backbone of the news story featuring as information sources or telling their personal stories.

Register of language

3) When the text includes scientific terms and technicalities these should be clearly explained. In these cases the use of rhetorical resources is very effective, namely:35 metaphor, example, definition, synonymy, analogy, personification, anecdote, experts’ quotations and explanatory apposition.

Information on context

4) When the text includes a method, technique or recommendation on HEPA it is crucial to mention availability, need for monitoring and specific gear and also accessibility (costs); the article should mention if it is a new idea or the remake of an existing concept, and compare it with existing alternatives.

Quantify benefit and possible health risks

5) The positive effects on health and risks of a method, technique or recommendation on HEPA should be expressed in quantitative instead of qualitative terms and always better in absolute, not only relative, terms. Examples for the same recommendation on HEPA are as follows:

  • a)

    Qualitative: “Daily physical activity increases life expectancy”;

  • b)

    Quantitative relative: “30minutes of daily physical activity increases life expectancy by 4.2%”;

  • c)

    Quantitative absolute and relative (with accessible language for the technicalities): “30minutes of daily moderate physical activity (you should be able to talk but not sing during the activity) increases life expectancy by 4.2%, i.e., 3.4 years for a person with the Spanish average life expectancy of 80 years.”

About recommendations on HEPA

6) When writing on HEPA we should remember to include at least the general recommendations to achieve the minimum physical activity (see Background). In addition, the story should include some tips to incorporate HEPA in our daily lives, such as those available in programs of prevention of sedentarism and promotion of physical activity.36

Topics that should feature more often

7) When defining the topics of the news stories on HEPA

  • a)

    Always mention the everyday life setting from the source study, because each setting offers different possibilities for exercising;

  • b)

    Specify the target age group of the information: children (preschool and school ages), adolescence, adults and the elderly;

  • c)

    and include information on specific diseases taking into account prevalence,1 avoiding just focusing on overweight and obesity.


A single researcher has conducted the coding phase due to funding constraints. In consequence, the study does not include data on intercoder reliability. However, we believe that this does not affect the objective of the study, since the results are in agreement with the trends already observed in previous studies and our method has proved to be able to measure strengths and limitations regarding the quality of news stories on HEPA and to suggest improvements for future news stories on health.

Sources of funding

No funding was received for this study.

Previous publications

None fragment of this manuscript has been previously communicated and is not being considered for publication, elsewhere.

Conflict of interest

Authors declare that they don’t have any conflict of interests.


We thank Dra. María del Mar Garcia-Gil of the Vascular Health Research Group of Girona (Primary Care University Research Institute Jordi Gol, Spain) for her contributions to the results and statistical treatment of data.

World Health Organization.
Global health risks: mortality and burden of disease attributable to selected major risks.
C. Bouchard, S.N. Blair, P.T. Katzmarzyk.
Less sitting, more physical activity, or higher fitness?.
Mayo Clin Proc, 90 (2015), pp. 1533-1540
I.-M. Lee, E.J. Shiroma, F. Lobelo, P. Puska, S.N. Blair, P.T. Katzmarzyk.
Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy.
J.F. Sallis, F. Bull, R. Guthold, G.W. Heath, S. Inoue, P. Kelly, et al.
Progress in physical activity over the Olympic quadrennium.
World Health Organization.
Global strategy on diet, physical activity and health.
World Health Organization.
Global recommendations on physical activity for health.
World Health Organization.
What is moderate-intensity and vigorous-intensity physical activity?.
M. Pratt, O.L. Sarmiento, F. Montes, D. Ogilvie, B.H. Marcus, L.G. Perez, et al.
The implications of megatrends in information and communication technology and transportation for changes in global physical activity.
National Cancer Institute. Making health communication programs work. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health & Human Services; 2008.
J.O. Prochaska, W.F. Velicer.
The transtheoretical model of health behavior change.
Am J Heal Promot, 12 (1997), pp. 38-48
D. Catalán, M. Muñoz-Cruzado, M.T. Fuentes.
Técnicas de comunicación para la prevención y el control de enfermedades.
Rev Española Comun en Salud, 1 (2010), pp. 50-65
M. McCombs.
Estableciendo la agenda el impacto de los medios en la opinión pública y en el conocimiento.
Paidós, (2006),
V. De Semir, G. Revuelta.
Sin intermediarios: científicos ante el público.
Dilemas y acuerdos éticos en la comunicación médica, pp. 29-35
S. Cortiñas Rovira, D. Lazcano-Peña, C. Pont Sorribes.
Estudio sobre los efectos de la crisis en la información de ciencia en los medios. ¿Qué opinan los periodistas científicos?.
Break Media Value Chain, (2014), pp. 79-89
S. Cortiñas-Rovira, D. Lazcano-Peña, C. Pont-Sorribes.
Periodistas científicos y efectos de la crisis sobre la información de ciencia: ¿hacia dónde va la profesión?.
Estudio del caso español, XVI (2015), pp. 142-150
G. Revuelta, V. De Semir, C. Armengou, G. Chirinos Maneiro, D.M. Rosero Caicedo.
Informe Quiral 2009.
Barcelona, (2010),
J. Garcia-Gil.
¿Por qué es necesario el análisis del contenido de las noticias sobre actividad física saludable?.
Prism Soc, (2014), pp. 364-401
De Semir V, Revuelta G, Foz M. (Director). La salud en el supermercado de la información. Humanit Humanidades Médicas. 2006;4,
A.D. Oxman, G.H. Guyatt, D.J. Cook, R. Jaeschke, N. Heddle, J. Keller.
An index of scientific quality for health reports in the lay press.
J Clin Epidemiol, 46 (1993), pp. 987-1001
R. Moynihan, L. Bero, D. Ross-Degnan, D. Henry, K. Lee, J. Watkins, et al.
Coverage by the news media of the benefits and risks of medication.
New Engl J Med, 342 (2000), pp. 1645-1650
G. Schwitzer.
A guide to reading health care news stories.
JAMA Intern Med, 174 (2014), pp. 1183
G. Schwitzer.
Is all published health care news actually newsworthy?.
Quad la Fund Dr Antoni Esteve, (2013), pp. 19-23
A. Cassels, J. Lexchin.
How well do Canadian media outlets convey medical treatment information? Initial findings from a year and a half of media monitoring by Media Doctor Canada.
Open Med, 2 (2008), pp. 7-10
A. Wilson, B. Bonevski, A. Jones, D. Henry.
Media reporting of health interventions: signs of improvement, but major problems persist.
K. Krippendorff.
Metodologi¿a de análisis de contenido: teori¿a y práctica.
Paidós, (1990),
L. Bardin.
Análisis del contenido.
Akal Universitaria, (1986),
J.J. Igartua.
Métodos cuantitativos de investigacio¿n en comunicacio¿n.
Bosch, (2006),
M. Quesada.
Periodismo especializado.
EUINSA, (1998),
M.R. Berganza Conde.
Periodismo especializado.
Ediciones Internacionales Universitarias, (2005),
J. Fernández del Moral.
Periodismo especializado.
Ariel, (2004),
F. Alcalà, M. Figueres, M. Mauri, R. Rodríguez, F. Salgado, C. Singla, et al.
The ethical values of journalists: field research among media professionals in Catalonia,
J.J. Igartua.
Mejor convencer entreteniendo: comunicación para la salud y persuasión narrativa.
Rev Comun Salud, 1 (2012), pp. 69-83
B.K. Pedersen, B. Saltin.
Exercise as medicine – evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases.
Scand J Med Sci Sports, 25 (2015), pp. 1-72
L.S. Pescatello.
ACSM's Guidelines for Exercise Testing and Prescription/American College of Sports Medicine.
9th ed., Wolters Kluwer/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Health, (2014),
S. Cortiñas Rovira.
Metaphors of DNA: a review of the popularisation processes.
J Sci Commun, 7 (2008), pp. 1-8
Government of Catalonia – Plan of Physical Activity Sport and Health.
Tips to be active.

Includes opinion articles and sponsored contents when they feature some recommendation or the benefits of HEPA.

Copyright © 2017. Consell Català de l'Esport. Generalitat de Catalunya
Apunts Sports Medicine
Article options

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?